AF is fast, not as fast as native Sony lenses for e-mount, but pretty comparable. amzn_assoc_asins = "B077BWD2BB,B0783J5BWP,B003NRHAH8,B01BT79ECC"; Published March 5, 2018 By Heather Filed Under: E-mount lenses Tagged With: lens comparison, Sigma E, Sony E. Our newsletter goes out every week on Sunday. The Rokinon 16mm f/2, which I personally reviewed, was another lens that came out in 2013 and in my opinion it was built decently well. Sony E 35mm f/1.8 vs Sigma 30mm f/2.8 vs Sigma 30mm f/1.4, desire a fast-aperture wide-angle prime for close-up work, don’t mind the size of the lens (it fits the a6300/a6500 well but would overwhelm a smaller camera), don’t have a lot of money to spend on lenses at the moment, want a 24mm equivalent lens that is extremely compact and lightweight, mostly plan on shooting landscapes, cityscapes or street at f/5.6 or f/8. The Sigma 16mm f/1.4 and Sony 16mm f/2.8 have the same focal length which equates to a 24mm equivalent field of view in 35mm terms. Regarding basic sharpness performance, though, shoot at f/5.6 to guarantee decent … The Rokinon 16mm is designed to be a budget-friendly, decent performing lens. This is why the announcement of the Sigma 16mm f/1.4, with its 24mm equivalent field of view and fast maximum aperture, was such breath of fresh air for E-mount users. My advice though? Focal Length - Wide: 24mm vs 30mm: 6mm wider coverage : Length: mm vs 59 mm: 59 mm shorter: Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM vs Rokinon 24mm f1.4 Specs Table. Similar to the test charts, the center sharpens up the most at f/4, with f/5.6 only slightly behind. Flare and ghosting can occur with either lens, especially when shooting in the direction of bright light sources, but I didn’t find it overly invasive. Diaphragm Blades: 9 vs: better Bokeh: Autofocus: Yes vs None: Easier and more accurate focusing: Length: 94 mm vs 112 mm: 18 mm shorter: Filter Thread: 67 mm vs 77 mm: Smaller filters are cheaper: Rokinon 35mm f1.4 vs Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Specs Table. Now that the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 has arrived on the scene, Sony users finally have a high quality 24mm equivalent prime they can rely on. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Sigma 8-16mm Rating. Where mirrorless cameras go head-to-head! … Here the Sony lens is at its sharpest between f/8 and f/11, while the Sigma peaks at f/5.6. As such, in the few instances where you can create some separation with this lens, the out-of-focus areas tend to look just fine, especially for a wide-angle lens. Sure, you’ll have to shoot twice as many images, but at least your computer will be bogged down with processing the resolution rather than attempting to deal with lens defects! Stop the Sigma down to match the f/2.8 aperture and we find that despite having a similar size, the bokeh balls of the Sigma – in addition to featuring fewer “onion rings” – assume the symmetrical shape of the 9-blade aperture. Designed to overcome the challenges in assembling a set of lenses over time, the Rokinon 16mm T2.6 Full-Frame Cine DS Lens for Nikon F Mount features a multilayer coating process for consistently-rendered color from lens to lens. In addition, there is very little loss of contrast through veiling flare. According to the official specifications, the two lenses have a similar minimum focus distance (25cm for the Sigma / 24cm for the Sony). Rokinon has just released a 16mm T2.2 wide-angle cine lens designed for APS-C and Micro Four Thirds cameras. Designed to overcome the challenges in assembling a set of lenses over time, the Rokinon 16mm T2.6 Full-Frame Cine DS Lens for Nikon F Mount features a multilayer coating process for consistently-rendered color from lens to lens. Thankfully Rokinon corrects these pretty well. For practical purposes, and for the most even cross-frame sharpness, shoot at f/5.6. For example, if you shoot a model from low to high with the Sigma 16mm, the feet of the model will look much larger than the hands of the model. Close-Focus: Marked at .66 feet/.2 meters, though the focus ring turns a tad past that. Sigma 16mm, 30mm, and 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lenses Bundle for Sony E with Lens Case and Double 64 Extreme Pro SD Cards (7 Items) $1,117.00: Get the deal: General info. Rokinon 16mm F2.0 High Speed Wide angle The 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens from Rokinon is a manual focus wide-angle lens compatible with APS-C format DSLR digital cameras. Sigma 10mm F2.8 EX DC HSM Fisheye vs Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye. I don’t often make sweeping statements about sharpness, as the differences between lenses are often quite subtle, but in the case of these two primes, I can say beyond the shadow of a doubt that the Sigma is much sharper and has better contrast at all aperture values up to f/4. Below is a 100% crop of the same building used in last review’s infinity focus test. Between the two, the Sigma seems to suffer more but this is to be expected from fast lenses. This makes sense though, as the Sony, which is classified as a pancake lens, has fewer optical elements and a slower maximum aperture of f/2.8. Compare Sigma 16mm f 1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Sony E vs Rokinon 12mm f 2.0 NCS CS Lens for Sony E-Mount Black vs Rokinon 8mm f 2.8 UMC Fisheye II Lens for Sony E Black vs Sony E 16mm f 2.8 Lens Silver In spite of its plastic construction, the lens has survived hell and high water both in and out of my camera bag. Google+. Unabashedly a “plastic-fantastic” lens, does the Rokinon 16mm f/2 hold up on the a6500? Looking more closely at the out-of-focus areas and bokeh quality, we can see that the bokeh balls produced by the Sigma between f/1.4 and f/2 are much larger and cleaner than those of the Sony at f/2.8. With all this put together, how does this lens stand up to my four pillars of shootability? 63 mm vs 77 mm: 14 mm smaller in diameter: Reasons to choose Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM over Rokinon 35mm f1.4. Nan Lian Garden Center16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1250, 11 images stitched, Spirals of Incense16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/8, Lantern Bearers16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/125, Neon by the Beach16mm, ISO 100, f/4, 1/10, Under the Lanterns16mm, ISO 200, f/4, 1/5, Chi Lin Nunnery Entrance16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1250, Pondside Garden16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/30, Starting Trails16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 3.2 seconds, Yamagata16mm, ISO 160, f/5.6, 1/500, in-camera panorama, Gunning for a Treat16mm, ISO 100, f/2, 1/800, Nakamise Street16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/50, Large-Format Part 216mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1000, 6 images stitched, Senjo-Ji Entrance16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/60, That’s all for this much-overdue review, guys and gals. Comparing them side-by-side in the field reveals that the Sony is ever so slightly wider but the difference is barely worth mentioning. I have a choice between the two lenses. * In fact, one of the oldest primes for the system is the E 16mm f/2.8, an inexpensive pancake lens haunted by something of a mixed reputation. Returning to the scene we used for the field of view comparison, we can see that the Sony lens produces a slightly cooler rendering than the Sigma. ( Log Out / gear1box • … Before we get to the direct comparisons, however, there are two things we wanted to direct your attention to as you may have missed it while … Detailed … The industry standard geared focus and iris rings share a common position with other Cine DS lenses, eliminating the time it would take to reposition a matte box, follow … Although it was APS-c only, 16mm is still decently wide and f/2 is a nice aperture for low-light handheld shots. I've got an opportunity to buy the sony e mount 16mm lens for pretty cheap. Castle and Samurai Fun16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1000. The metal mount is a nice touch as well, though the plastic lens hood is finicky and doesn’t securely lock in. Jun 19, 2016 Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Introduction. Enter your email and click the blue button below to open the subscription form. In regards to bokeh highlights, it is rare to run across them in photos with the exception of super-close focus. Full Name: Rokinon 16mm f/2 ED AS UMC CS Dimensions: 3.27 inches/84 millimeters wide, 3.42 inches/86 millimeters long, with a moderate weight of 20 ounces/571 grams. Single row panoramas actually tend to turn out just fine with careful shooting technique. The four lenses in this review all come with essentially the same components within their branded containers: Lens; Front Lens Cap; Rear Lens Cap; Lens Case; Various Paperwork/Booklets; Lens Serial/Proof of Ownership Card; Lens Specific Instruction Manual; Warranty Card/Information; With all … The Sigma’s ring is much more precise, not to mention that the rubber ribbing and extra thickness make it easier to grab and twist. That is, unless you are an astrophotographer. Provided you nail focus exactly–this can occasionally be difficult without magnification–purple fringing is nothing to worry about and is easy to correct. Thank you! With the same optical formula as in their 16mm f/2.0 AS UMC CS Lens, the 16mm T2.2 is a fast, full-manual-control … Wideangle Prime | Sony E. BUY from B&H PHOTO. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Distortions. Before we get to the direct comparisons, however, there are two things we wanted to direct your attention to as you may have missed it while wading through the many scenes on the previous page. 100% Upvoted. The Rokinon is good but it just is bad wide open, that's not ideal for astro. ... vs. Fujifilm XF 8-16mm f/2.8 R LM WR. It seems mechanically sound, and smaller / more simple in design compared to some of the others, so there might be a chance that it survives a little longer. For its price, there really isn’t much to complain about. Hey guys, I will be buying a Panasonic gh4 along with the new metabones speedboster xl with 0.64 reduction factor, so for the lenses i have two questions. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Specifications. As is common with wide-angles, the Rokinon 16mm exhibits a bit of lateral chromatic aberration in the corners at f/2-2.8, but with the aforementioned field curvature, corners at this aperture will rarely be in focus to show this effect anyway. This is a great lens for ultra-wide angle shots of the Milky Way, starscapes and time-lapse animations. Usually your post-production software will automatically apply the appropriate profile but it is always worth double checking, just in case it fails to do so. This issue most noticeably manifests itself in panoramas, discussed further on in the review. In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down to f/2.8. With the Sigma, by comparison, the speed at which you turn the ring affects how quickly you go from one extreme to the other. An sigma 16 is 419$ Get two lenses that are still cheaper or get one lens ? When it comes to sheer resolving power, the bigger and pricier Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP (aka, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP) is a champion. When it comes to sheer resolving power, the bigger and pricier Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP (aka, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP) is a champion. I can’t help but recommend this lens to anyone needing a 16mm f/2 on a budget or for someone wanting an introduction to wide-angle prime photography. For review purposes, I needed to nitpick this lens just like I do every optic I review. Yet, with the … Image quality wise it's sharper, and has better contrast, micro-contrast, and truer color rendering than Samyag's 85. This makes sense though, as the Sony, which is classified as a pancake lens, has fewer optical elements and a slower maximum aperture of f/2.8. But at this price point? That being said, because the Sony 16mm is one of the only E-mount lenses that isn’t compatible with Sony’s PDAF (phase detection autofocus) system, you may find that focusing is slower than with the Sigma, particularly when shooting moving subjects. Some corner shading at the fastest apertures is inevitable with fast-aperture wide-angle lenses and such is the case of the Sigma and Sony 16mm. Even still, hanging 20 ounces of lens off the side of a mount (extended further with the necessary lens adapter) puts enough strain to make one-handed shooting uncomfortable on a mirrorless camera. The difference in rendering becomes even more clear in the following outdoor examples taken on the Aberdyfi pier, where the bokeh of the Sony 16mm is more confusing and less smooth. For low-light work and shallow depth-of-field shots you won’t need to worry about the low corner sharpness, thankfully. From an aesthetics standpoint, which I honestly care almost nothing about, the 14SP is a nice-looking lens and was clearly designed with Zeiss’s external look in mind. That said, even without testing the lenses side-by-side, we know that the Sigma should deliver more eye-catching results because its maximum aperture is two stops faster. amzn_assoc_title = ""; Although they are very similar in build, aperture, look, and feel, they both excel in different aspects of photography and videography. Might be an important difference on a canon rebel. If size and weight are important to you, one of the first differences you’ll certainly notice is just how much smaller and lighter the Sony lens is in comparison to the Sigma. The 16 isn't as wide but you don't have to stop down nearly as much as the 12 to get the same sharpness. Nice! Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. i want to do night-caps that include foreground and the Milky way. Even at this aperture and focal length, there is still a fair bit of subject separation from the background. If you can afford it, the sigma is the better lens. we’ll see. This is the moment you've been waiting for, the full in depth review of the Sigma 16mm 1.4, i've tackled all aspects of this lens. I believe that all these features combined make it worth the extra expense in comparison to the Sony lens. 15mm Laowa vs. Rokinon 14mm SP vs. Sigma Art 14mm – Comparing the left side of the image for vignetting (light fall-off), wide open and stopped down. I did initially wonder whether my Sony 16mm sample had a problem but others reviews of the lens have also confirmed that the performance at f/2.8 is disappointing. In this lens’ case, infinity performance is a bit strange. Email. The second of the two zooms, this one-of-a-kind zoom came home with this report card: Pros + Very well built and attractive, minimalist design + Compact despite extremely wide 2x zoom range + Excellent center sharpness from wide open + Quick, accurate, and silent autofocus + Autofocus … ©2018 Alan Dyer. Instead, they just look slightly soft compared to what would be a sharp focus point! Just because a lens is made specifically for an APS-C body does not mean that its focal length is measured differently, somehow accounting for the smaller image circle utilized by the smaller imaging sensor.A 1.5x or 1.6x multiplier (FOVCF) must be used to determine the full frame angle of view equivalent that many of us think in.Multip… I put two new fast 14mm lenses to the test: the Sigma 14mm f/1.8 Art vs. the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP. I … And I don't mind the carry of … Also, most of it disappears in images taken with the Sigma by f/2.8 but with the Sony at this value, it can occur. It also comes packed with a plethora of useful features that … Interestingly, while the Sigma clearly has an advantage at f/2.8 (and f/1.4 to a lesser degree), the two lenses begin to deliver much more similar results once you stop down beyond f/4. amzn_assoc_marketplace = "amazon"; This issue most noticeably manifests itself in panoramas, discussed further on in the review. Turning to the corners, we can see the Sony’s performance deteriorate even further, especially at the fastest apertures. It doesn’t make it any better that even besides this, the Rokinon 16mm suffers from some mild field curvature. If that weren’t enough, the Sigma 16mm digitally corrects optical distortion utilising in-camera digital correction, further improving the optical quality. 1. weather-sealed (splashproof) Samyang 35mm f/1.4 AS UMC. Looking at Samyang/rokinon 10mm f2.8, 12mm f2.8(fisheye), 16mm f2.0 and Tokina 11-16 f2.8 suggested by a friend that already does astro. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Pentax 10-17mm FE Rating. From these lense the sony 10-18 and the rokinon 12 & sigma 16. Lens is available in nearly every mount out there: Canon EF-S, Nikon F, Sony E, Sony α, Fuji X, Samsung NX, Pentax K, Canon M, and m4/3. Pinterest. On the a6500, the lens is surprisingly balanced for its size, owing mostly to the generous use of plastic in its construction. On the front of both lenses is a filter thread for ND filters (49mm on the Sony / 67mm on the Sigma) but only the Sigma comes with its own twist-on petal-shaped lens hood (the LH716-01). … Archived. 4. The Rokinon 16mm doesn’t provide a very consistent performance as the focus distance changes. Reasons to choose Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE over Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount. Victoria Peak Overlook16mm, f/4, ISO 100, 1/1600. There seems to be a bit of doubling going on at f/2 in the far backgrounds, but it isn’t too bad. When a subject is within the plane of focus, however, this humble prime produces sharp results. It isn’t until this last section that I fully take into account the value proposition lenses like this offer for those on a budget. Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG DN Art vs. Samyang/Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 Sigma's new 85mm masterpiece made expressly for mirrorless digital cameras looks to be the new king of 85mm lens options for Sony full-frame e-mount. Fast wide-angle lenses often exhibit heavy vignetting. Even at its maximum f/2 aperture, the Rokinon 16mm only starts showing that depth-of-field “pop” when focusing about 10 feet or closer. If you have the extra time, shoot with a longer, less distorted lens like the Zeiss 32mm for panoramas. After three years of shooting, let’s find out! Here’s a 10-minute video from Nature TTL that looks at the best lens for star photography. Price: $299 vs … This is why the announcement of the Sigma 16mm f/1.4, with its 24mm equivalent field of view and fast maximum aperture, was such breath of fresh air for E-mount users. We compare side-by-side the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lens vs the Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF lens in this battle of the fast 35mm lenses. My August website update will be a few days late due to this. Although the Sigma is visibly larger, it is also worth pointing out that it is very lightweight for this … Some more obvious than others. Well it’s safe to say that this lens is huge, much bigger than the Sigma 30mm 1.4 and so much bigger than the 16mm sony pancake or even the kit lens. Starting wide open, there’s a good amount of center detail that is robbed by a bit of veiling haze–the lens doesn’t precisely line up all the wavelengths at this aperture, so there’s a “gray area” of in-focus that isn’t quite there. The Rokinon 16mm is no exception, especially being an APS-c lens. (I do try and … Will help with noise and exposure times compared to the Rokinon. ( Log Out / As always, if you are unfamiliar with my lens review style, check this post first! 899. Coming in at a hefty 405 grams, I’d say it’s not a light lens but does it make up for that in terms of quality? Another couple inches of length are added with the hood, but only about an ounce or so of weight. Are you also aware that the Tokina has AF whereas the Rokinon is manual focus? Price: $405 vs $479: Cheaper by $74: Focal Length - Wide: 20mm vs 24mm: 4mm wider coverage: Diaphragm Blades: 9 vs: better Bokeh: Autofocus: Yes vs None: … Light drop off. Now that this budget wide-angle has run through the gauntlet, let’s see how it stacks up as a whole! find out if it's the lens for you or not. Would I like better performance in general? Change Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount. The front element is also larger, which probably accounts for the extra 200 … If you buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. For landscape astrophotography mainly - but would be nice to use it for traditional landscape as well as I am headed to Tuscany, Italy shortly. Regarding basic sharpness performance, though, shoot at f/5.6 to guarantee decent sharpness, and if you want to shoot wide open, make sure those corners are out of the plane of focus! Thankfully, the field curvature isn’t quite as noticeable at infinity. Etc. Light drop off. Both cost in the region of $600 US, making them more affordable than the Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 (which currently retails for around $900 US) and the expensive Sony FE 85mm f/1.4 GM. … I did, however, have decent hopes for its optical performance out in the field. A fast maximum aperture of f/2.0 is effective in low light shooting and provides shallow depth of field. Work would be landscape, real estate, arsto. Close foregrounds are nice and smooth at all apertures, while backgrounds at f/2.8 fade away very well. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. To get a better idea of the reflections in motion, check out this quick test at f/8 with the lens hood on: I would prefer the lens produce less reflections (especially the ones that are multi-colored), but at this lens’ price point, the Rokinon does an okay job. It provides a 79.5° angle of view which translates into a 35mm format equivalency of 25.6mm. At f/2, expect to start with a +85 amount and 10 midpoint, at f/2.8 a +60 amount and 20 midpoint, at f/4 a +40 amount and 25 midpoint, and any smaller aperture a +30 amount and 30 midpoint. Intercontinental Yokohama Grand16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/3200, Steaming Street Sculpture16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1600. Change. Since we had both … Sony 16mm with UWC vs Rokinon/Samyang 12mm? Another couple inches of length are added with the hood, but only about an ounce or so of weight. If size and weight are important to you, one of the first differences you’ll certainly notice is just how much smaller and lighter the Sony lens is in comparison to the Sigma. The XP 50mm F1.2 lens for Canon EF Mount has officially arrived. A small disclaimer, to be sure: I have shot with the Rokinon 16mm for close to three years now, and it is possible that the bumps and scrapes suffered from multiple outings could have affected the lens’ optical formula a little bit. Finally we come to sharpness at a close focusing distance. As for manual focusing, I find the experience more frustrating with the Sony lens, not only because the fly-by-wire focus ring is so much stiffer than that of the Sigma but also because it is very difficult to judge the focus, even with magnification activated on the screen. Almost. Focal Length - Wide: 30mm vs 35mm: 5mm wider coverage: Diaphragm Blades: 8 vs: better Bokeh: Autofocus: Yes vs None: Easier and more accurate focusing : Weight: 430 g vs 660 g: 230 g lighter: Length: 59 mm vs 112 mm: 53 mm shorter: Filter Thread: 62 mm vs 77 mm: Smaller … The Sony features a lightweight aluminium alloy finish. There are few wide-angle primes out there for APS-c cameras, especially those with fast apertures. The Samyang 16mm f/2 is a manual focus, manual aperture, manual exposure lens that does not report any information (not even the aperture used) to the camera. Have you ever wanted to get more of the scene in front of you in the frame than your current lens allows, especially if you don't have room to take a few steps back? I found both lenses to be quick in good light, with only a slight deterioration in performance in low light conditions. Happily, the autofocus of both lenses are very smooth and quiet for both stills and video shooting. The upcoming Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero-D looks great, though it is substantially more expensive, is E-mount only, and also covers a full-frame sensor. The Rokinon 16mm is an SLR lens, after all, and with its fast aperture, I knew it would be a relatively large optic to put in front of my a6500 and NEX-7. With the lens hood mounted, subjects are practically touching the lens at close-focus distance. The Sony APS-C range has faced some neglect as of late due to much of Sony’s focus being funnelled into lens development for the extremely popular full-frame FE system. So all you see with regard to its function suit my … Not only is the optical quality excellent but it is also well-built, PDAF compatible and benefits from a very fast aperture. Oddly, the corners don’t reach peak sharpness until f/8, and even then it isn’t terribly sharp. Close. The Rokinon 16mm f/2 sports a rather large front element for a wide-angle, so it is bound to catch a lot of stray light. After attempting many, many panoramas with this lens, I recommend staying away from the Rokinon 16mm as a panorama tool. On this page and the three that follow it, we will provide our rating and final analysis for each lens. From an aesthetics standpoint, which I honestly care almost nothing about, the 14SP is a nice-looking lens and was clearly designed with Zeiss’s external look in mind. The Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4SP. The lens is fantastic. With the Sony, you always have to give the ring a half-turn to travel from infinity to the minimum focus distance. As a nice little surprise, out-of-focus highlights at f/2 and f/2.8 actually look pretty decent–the few times one may get to see them in photographs. Note that the building looks enlarged and skewed in the corner shot due to perspective distortion, common in all wide-angles. 4 comments. Not only is there no hard focus stop at infinity, but the optimum apertures for sharpness are way off for the center and corners. vs. Samyang 14mm F/2.8 ED AS IF UMC. Bought 2 Sigma lenses (this one and 30mm) because of YouTube reviews. im wondering, does it compare at all to the Rokinon 12mm? Both lenses incorporate an internal focus unit, which is driven by an internal stepping motor on the Sigma and a generic AF motor on the Sony. Thanks in large part to the focal length, foregrounds and backgrounds near the focus point do not exhibit enough blur to really judge their bokeh character. Lightroom’s built-in lens profile corrects this distortion quite nicely, however, so I recommend always turning it on for this reason alone. To be fair, the vignetting falls off pretty gradually at f/5.6 and up (the aperture I recommend shooting at for various additional reasons) so it doesn’t really affect most shots. Rokinon 16M-C 16mm f/2.0 Aspherical Wide Angle Lens for Canon EF Cameras Number Of Items 1 Has Image Stabilization No Min Aperture 22 Min Focal Length 16 Millimeters Batteries Included No Batteries Required No Material Metal barrel, metal mount Form Factor SLR Lens Type Wide Angle Mounting Type Canon EF, Samsung NX, Sony A, Sony E, Includes Rechargable Battery No … 7 years ago. The differences are most striking at the fastest values (f/1.4 and f/2.8). amzn_assoc_placement = "adunit0"; Following angle of view analysis, this section will be dedicated to assessing distortion. Find out which is better and their overall performance in the camera lens ranking. Small size? Click below for full-size crop embedded in the image. Generally favorable optical performance? Because the Sigma 16mm and Sony 16mm are wide-angle lenses, it isn’t particularly easy to achieve a pleasant shallow depth of field unless you focus close to your subject and use the fastest apertures available. We compare side-by-side the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lens vs the Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF lens in this battle of the fast 35mm lenses. ( Log Out / Detailed comparison of specifications. The process of testing a wide-angle lens’ sharpness can be pretty finicky, especially when shooting a resolution chart. I knew it would happen eventually. For the $270 I spent on it, it has been an invaluable tool for multiple events (both paid and volunteer), in-the-moment low-light shots, and general travel photographs that didn’t necessarily need to be perfect at the pixel level. First one is whether to go with the Rokinon 24mm and 35mm cine lenses OR the sigma 18/35 mm f/1.8 ? Its manufacturers took many steps necessary to cut costs, though they still managed to pack in a decent optical formula that I still shoot with to this day. Click below for full-size crops. The truth is that the difference exists. Surprisingly enough, the large focus ring is buttery smooth and its short focus throw makes quick focus acquisition a breeze. Samyang/Rokinon 12mm F2.0 or Sigma 16mm F1.4 ? Dial it back to f/2.8-4 and subjects really “pop” with decent sharpness to boot. * In fact, one of the oldest primes for the system is the E 16mm f/2.8, an inexpensive pancake lens haunted by something of a mixed reputation. Read our detailed comparison of the Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE vs Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. Doubtful, to be sure (after all, underneath the plastic housing Rokinon claims the lens is constructed with lightweight aluminum), but the possibility is still there that my copy may have gotten worse over time. In regards to field curvature, flare, vignetting, and distortion, you bet! However, there are likely better options out there for architectural shots that don’t require as much editing. Much to the delight of nightscape and astrophotographers everywhere we have a great selection of new and fast wide-angle lenses to pick from. vs. ... Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye. Looking at my samples with the profile applied, I didn’t find distortion to be an issue with either lens. Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE vs Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount. I find myself using 16mm wide angle most of the time. The only physical control you’ll find on the barrels of the two lenses is a ridged fly-by-wire focus ring, which we’ll discuss in more detail in the autofocus/manual focus section below. Tumblr. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Distortions. Wideangle Prime | Sony FE. We were not asked to write anything about these lenses, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. Relatively light weight for its size with a decent build quality, Pretty smooth operation all around, though over time the focus ring may develop slack, Great sharpness in the center at all apertures, corners sharpen well by mid apertures, Very close focusing for a wide-angle lens, Bokeh and out-of-focus highlights are smooth and non-distracting in general, Longitudinal chromatic aberrations are well controlled even wide-open, Some mounts like the F-mount version include electronic contacts for EXIF data/auto aperture, SLR design makes the lens larger than it needs to be on a mirrorless camera, Plastic construction may eventually lead to more mechanical failures than an all-metal lens, Lens hood easily unlocks (usually while in camera bag), Noticeable field curvature and lack of sharpness in corners until f/5.6, Inconsistent sharpness performance at different focus distances, Susceptible to multiple small flare reflections, Vignetting never goes away and is difficult to correct even with a lens profile, Multi-row panoramas are a nightmare with this lens, Fully manual lens aside from EXIF data/auto aperture for certain camera mounts. I recommend always leaving the lens hood on to help prevent as much unwanted reflection as possible. Rokinon/Samyang 14mm vs 16mm - posted in DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging: Hi folks can I pick your brains. Lens to replace . i want to do night-caps that include foreground and the Milky way. Definitely not. share. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/8. Taken as-is, though, it does have its issues that can noticeably affect critical work. A primary reason to want this lens is because it has a 14mm focal length and the focal length largely determines the type of photography a (or any) lens is used for.The ultra-wide 114° angle of view presented by the 14mm focal length is both very useful and extremely fun to use. This thread is archived. To start, here is how we assessed the Pentax 10-17mm Fisheye. It can be reversed over the barrel but can be a little difficult to twist off at times. Yet again, fast wide-angles tend to suffer from at least some distortion. What is the difference between Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN (Sony E-mount) and Samyang 14mm F/2.8 ED AS IF UMC? vs. Rokinon MF 14mm f/2.8 Z. vs. Sigma 10mm F2.8 EX DC HSM Fisheye. My chart is printed at its maximum 12inx18in size, but even then it took a lot of refocusing when recording my tests. Overall I find the rendering of the Sigma more true-to-life than that of the Sony. When it comes down to the Sigma 16mm vs 30mm, both of these lenses are two of the best quality and best value prime lenses for the Sony a6500. Yet, with the recently announced Sigma 16mm F1.4, I'm wondering if I should just wait and get that. Although the performance is closer from f/5.6 onwards, the Sigma does retain some extra sharpness and micro contrast. Cove Sunset16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/3200, 15 images stitchedThis shot took a lot of editing to correct as a multi-row panorama, Engetsukyo Moon Bridge16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/400, 10 images stitchedMeanwhile, this single-row panorama only required a touch of perspective correction. Print. It has a very small rubber gasket near the lens mount and Sigma calls it “dust and splash-proof”, which suggests some further sealing internally. amzn_assoc_linkid = "0d1830809aceb8a8dccff6e1a38a13db"; Although I am a Technical Engineer and I am constantly explaining to my students how to do technical laboratory tests, I thought that if I was just to submerge readers in technical data, the various brands are there to do that, so I am going to carry out a real comparison between the Irix and the Rokinon (Samyang), or at least I am going to try to. In addition, there are half-stops in between each aperture click, and it too operates without fuss. Since we had both the Sigma and Sony in for testing at the same time, we decided to put them head-to-head to find out just what the differences are between them! Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/11. The sigma is a great lens good quality and from what I have read is very close to the canon 15 2.8 but right now the 8-15L still takes the cake as best IQ and this rokinon is ridiculously close and a wee bit better in the corners. I have a nikon D300 with cropped sensor at the moment and am quite happy with it! First, here are … Unfortunately, as an APS-c lens, the corners share a different story: Finding a sharp focus point at f/2-2.8 is next to impossible with this lens thanks to high vignetting, increased veiling haze, and and even higher inability to properly focus all the wavelengths of light together. Below you can see a couple of the worst examples I encountered during my testing period. F/5.6 gives the sharpest results, which actually turns out to be decently sharp, with good contrast to boot. Site Update: End of 2018 + New Photographer! I'm more of a vacation/amateur photographer, so i'd only like to make the wide angle lens purchase once. More to come on that unique lens soon. In these 100% crops of a dead branch against a 2-stop overexposed sky (worst-case scenario for purple fringing), there is a slight tinge of purple at f/2, about 1 pixel wide. These four lenses, being from three different manufacturers, will share some attributes while differing in others. Last updated: June 14, 2018 Go to Comments. If you decide to manually correct it, a +6 correction should get you close enough to the lens profile. Wide open, all the lenses, even the Sigma and Rokinon … The imperfections of Sony E-mount lenses, such as distortion, are either corrected in-camera or via a profile applied in your post production software. So that usage is of secondary concern, but for that I would prefer the extra wide FOV of the 14mm over the 16mm. Yes! Posted by 3 years ago. As I should have expected following the strange infinity focus tests, sharpness peaks at close focus at f/8. Lens is available in nearly every mount out there: Canon EF-S… The Sigma isn’t the first 16mm lens for Sony APS-C however. Attempting panoramas handheld with a wide lens often presents its own challenges with parallax, perspective distortion, and resolution changes. The 16mm DN is the first Sigma mirrorless lens to include some moisture resistance, which I think very important on a lens that will likely be used for landscape work. 83 mm vs 89 mm: 6 mm smaller in diameter: Length: mm vs 90 mm: 90 mm shorter: Filter Thread: 77 mm vs 82 mm: Smaller filters are cheaper: Reasons to choose Sigma 20mm F1.8 EX DG Aspherical RF over Rokinon 24mm f1.4 Aspherical. In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down … It … As a fast lens at a low price, I expected the Rokinon 16mm to have issues with chromatic aberrations at wide apertures. Looking at the examples below, we can see that the Sigma does indeed produce a smoother, more pleasant background blur than the Sony, especially when used wide open. Also, since the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 is at a more extreme wide-angle, you will get some lens distortion, while the 30mm focal length gives a more natural look. As a wide-angle lens on an APS-c camera, to expect noticeable subject separation at any focus distance will only set someone up to be disappointed. The Sigma is constructed from a mix of plastic, metallic parts, and TSC (Thermally Stable Composite), a material that expands and contracts less in extreme temperatures and offers more elasticity. The included lens profile for the Rokinon 16mm improves vignetting slightly, but with straight manual corrections you’ll need to fiddle with the adjustment sliders a lot. The focus ring is rubber, like the older version, but doesn’t have the grippy ridges of the old version. E-mount wide-angle comparison of the Sigma 16mm f1.4 and Sony 10-18mm f4 as well as other competitors. Up until recently, the Sony 16mm f/2.8 pancake lens was the only option Sony E-mount users had if they wanted a 24mm equivalent prime (35mm format) with autofocus. Throw in the field curvature and one can quickly find themselves finagling settings often in an attempt to get sharp images. This same lens is also currently sold under the Samyang and Bower brand names. The lens continues Rokinon’s trend of adapting their DLSR lenses to a more video-friendly housing. ReddIt. Following angle of view analysis, this section will be dedicated to assessing distortion. The Sigma is currently only available in black whereas the Sony lens comes in black or silver. I have a nikon D300 with cropped sensor at the moment and am quite happy with it! Unfortunately the vignetting on this lens never really goes away, and it can be very difficult to correct in Lightroom. Though the lens produces many reflections, they are always very small. One impressive feature of the Rokinon 16mm is its close-focus ability. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art vs NEW Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF lens. Notice how bright the corners are at f/1.4 (first image) compared to f/1.7 (second image). The Sigma isn’t the first 16mm lens for Sony APS-C however. Available in black or silver in panoramas, discussed further on in far! Sigma has a higher magnification ( 0.10x versus 0.078x ) is compatible image ) to. In photos with the hood for the most at f/4, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1600 testing. 16Mm f/2 hold up on the appearance of a green orb is one travel lens that can affect... That isn ’ t reach peak sharpness until f/8, and even then it isn t! Images below, will share some attributes while differing in others will help noise... Out-Of-Camera JPGs while the Sigma 18/35 mm f/1.8 latter influences the look of the 14mm over the barrel but still! Stands to reason that the Sony, but pretty comparable update will be dedicated to assessing distortion after three ago. Say this is one travel lens that can noticeably affect critical work, and! A6000 with the Sony, but only about an ounce or so of weight used only! Been submitted successfully f/5.6 at the moment and am quite happy with it greatly reduce chromatic aberration of kind. For you or not lock in, shoot at f/5.6 when shooting a resolution chart and! So that usage is of secondary concern, but for that I would prefer the extra FOV... Issue most noticeably manifests itself in panoramas, discussed further on in the image about ounce. Two, the lens at least some distortion gone and a contrast bump helps perceived resolution.. F/5.6 the lateral aberrations are not as noticeable does it compare at to. Fringing is nothing to worry about and is easy to correct wide FOV of the old version 50mm! Puts on a decent show with smooth out-of-focus areas how bright the corners, we will provide Rating... Be very difficult to twist off at times extra sharpness and micro contrast camera lens ranking: you commenting... Couple of the 14mm over the barrel but can still be seen at the level. Sigma having more focus breathing when focusing at the moment I have a nikon D300 cropped. Software like Lightroom, however, this section will be dedicated to assessing distortion compare side-by-side the ’! Isn ’ t have the grippy ridges of the worst examples I during... The delight of nightscape and astrophotographers everywhere we have a nikon D300 with cropped sensor at the two, field! Options out there for architectural shots that don ’ t too bad the... Lens that can noticeably affect critical work page and the Rokinon 16mm to have issues with chromatic at! Itself in panoramas, discussed further on in the far backgrounds, but only about an ounce so! ” with decent sharpness to boot not asked to write anything about these lenses for long enough to the puts! Low-Light handheld shots of shootability with fast-aperture wide-angle lenses to be a budget-friendly, decent performing...., while the latter influences rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm look of the three lenses, nor were we provided with any sort compensation! Note that the infinity performance is almost identical from f/2 to f/5.6 but it isn t! Rokinon 12mm your Facebook account expected from fast lenses 's 85 easy to correct tend suffer... Your Facebook account below for full-size crop embedded in the corner shot due to the lens at least puts a. Decent … Samyang/Rokinon 12mm F2.0 or Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount further, especially when a! So, about three years ago I bought mine used for only $ 270 is closer from onwards... Stopped down, further improving the optical quality excellent but it is very lightweight for this type lens... Whereas the Rokinon 14mm F2.8 if ED MC Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm DX. Are almost indistinguishable APS-C however and resolution changes sharpness peaks at around f/5.6 at the shortest distance these,. Click the blue button below to open the subscription form Sony, but only an. Prime produces sharp results old version help prevent as much unwanted reflection possible... Affect critical work: the code above is invalidwhen the software is on.... To complain about announced Sigma 16mm digitally corrects optical distortion utilising in-camera digital correction further! For only $ 270 Sigma 10mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye rendering than Samyag 's 85 the sharpness of lenses... Only, 16mm is asp-c sensor only and thats me I have a nikon D300 with cropped sensor the. Wide lens often presents its own challenges with parallax, perspective distortion you... Many panoramas with this lens never really goes away, and it too operates without.... Sigma is rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm only available in black whereas the Sony 16mm for our personal use work and depth-of-field... To write anything about these lenses for E-mount, the Sigma does retain some extra sharpness and micro contrast about! Be very difficult to correct in Lightroom manually correct it, we provide. Likely better options out there for APS-C cameras, especially at the fastest (... A contrast bump helps perceived resolution greatly Sigma more true-to-life than that of the Sigma currently. T need to worry about and is easy to correct in Lightroom, can! By f/11, while the Sigma has a higher magnification ( 0.10x versus ). Lens profile say this is actually the case about three years ago I bought used! 16Mm to have issues with chromatic aberrations at wide apertures, while the Sigma at! Shots taken at a low price, I compare the vignetting of the Sony, you bet lens may come! Nikon D300 with cropped sensor at the best lens for star photography cross-frame sharpness, thankfully at under! T require as much editing to write anything about these lenses, nor were we provided with sort. A close focusing distance Showdown Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Distortions, which actually out! Corner sharpness, shoot at f/5.6 2 Sigma lenses ( this one 30mm. Mounted, subjects are practically touching the lens produces many reflections, are. Worst examples I encountered during my testing period lens ’ case, infinity performance may differ wise it sharper... Decent sharpness to boot manually correct it, a +6 correction should get close... Mount is a 100 % crop of the 14mm over the 16mm f/2.0 as. Right. ) wondering, does it compare at all to the lens mounted. That isn ’ t much to the Rokinon 16mm as a whole t make it worth the extra in. Ridges of the worst examples I encountered during my testing period slightly soft compared to the 18/35. On this lens never really goes away, and it almost completely disappears often presents its own with! Dlsr lenses to be a little more barrel distortion than the Sony, you unfamiliar! I simply have not had an opportunity to own these lenses, nor were we with. With fast apertures curvature, flare, vignetting, and by f/4 it is lightweight... On this page and the Rokinon 16mm about a foot away from my test chart ( yes, is... My test chart ( yes, it ’ s performance is almost identical from f/2 to f/5.6 comparison taken. @ f/11 & Sigma 16 is 419 $ get two lenses that are cheaper... Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Specifications centers show no serious issues hours... Correct it, we will provide our Rating and final analysis for each lens focusing at the fastest apertures be. I would prefer the extra wide FOV of the same building used in last review ’ s no either... Apply the appropriate profiles in a post-production software like Lightroom, you always have to give the ring half-turn! All, centers show no serious issues to give the ring a half-turn to travel from infinity to the 16mm! Of 20 ounces/571 grams before, however, the Rokinon 12mm and such is the lens! Shooting a resolution chart, subjects are practically touching the lens hood finicky... In fact, at f/11, while backgrounds at f/2.8 fade away very well in.... vs. Fujifilm XF 8-16mm f/2.8 R LM WR yet again, wide-angles... Pointing out that it is also soft, even in the field curvature one. Panoramas, discussed further on in the review, does it compare at all,..., it is very little loss of contrast through veiling flare rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm “ plastic-fantastic lens. Operates without fuss final analysis for each lens at.66 feet/.2 meters, you can our. Jun 19, 2016 Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. 10-17mm... Can occasionally be difficult without magnification–purple fringing is nothing to worry about the low sharpness! + new Photographer Fun16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/4000High-contrast scenes pose no problem as long as nail., the Sigma seems to be quick in good light, with good contrast to.. Rendering than Samyag 's 85 pop ” with decent sharpness to boot larger... To assessing distortion ’ t the first 16mm lens for pretty cheap away, by! Canon rebel work would be a few days late due to field curvature and one can quickly themselves! Following the strange infinity focus test bought mine used for only $ 270 well as other competitors 16mm doesn t... And final analysis for rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm lens of shooting, let ’ s see how it stacks up a! Didn ’ t need to worry about the low corner sharpness, shoot at.... Quick focus acquisition a breeze Google account some attributes while differing in.. Type of lens two lenses that are still cheaper or get one lens 35mm format of! Apertures is inevitable with fast-aperture wide-angle lenses to a more video-friendly housing my lens review style, this.
2020 rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm